Map how the business runs now
Before any software is discussed: how an order becomes an invoice, where the same figure is entered twice, what has to be true for month-end to close, and which spreadsheets are load-bearing.
Services
ERP programmes fail in predictable ways, and almost never for technical reasons. They fail because the process was never agreed before the software was configured, because the data going in was worse than anyone admitted, or because nobody owned the system after go-live.
The situation
For businesses running finance and operations on systems that no longer talk to each other — or on one system nobody uses past the basics.
The tell is month-end. If closing the books means exporting from two systems, reconciling them in a spreadsheet and asking someone to confirm the stock figure by hand, the problem is not the closing process. It is that no single record of the business exists, so every question has to be answered by assembling one.
That has become more expensive to live with. Electronic tax invoicing is now mandatory for VAT-registered businesses, withholding agents and anyone turning over more than five million shillings, and since January 2026 the Revenue Authority validates the income and expenses declared in a return against its own eTIMS records. An expense with no matching electronic invoice is disallowed and becomes taxable income. A business whose purchase records live partly in a system and partly in a drawer is carrying a tax exposure, not just an administrative irritation.
An ERP is how a business stops keeping several versions of itself. That is worth saying plainly, because it is also the hard part — the software is the smaller half of the work, and any firm that tells you otherwise is selling the licence.
What changes
Most organisations arrive at this practice from a recognisable place. This is the distance it covers.
Month-end assembled by hand from several systems
Reporting that runs from one set of numbers
Stock figures nobody entirely trusts
One inventory position, visible to everyone
The same data keyed into three different places
Entered once, posted everywhere it belongs
An ERP nobody uses past the basics
The system finally earning what you paid for it
What this practice covers
Engagements draw on whichever of these the situation needs. Very few use all of them, and we will say which we think apply before you commit to anything.
Independent work on requirements and fit before anything is bought, including the honest question of whether the system you already own can be made to do the job.
Configuration, data and integration — the phase where programmes are won or lost, and where the data work is always larger than the plan assumed.
The operational areas an ERP is expected to carry, on one ledger, so a sale, a stock movement and a posting are the same event rather than three.
Most businesses use a fraction of what they have already paid for. This is the work of closing that gap without buying anything further.
Support and ongoing management after go-live, which is when statutory changes arrive and when most implementations quietly begin to decay.
How it runs
Every engagement has a decision point at the end of each stage. You can stop at any one of them, and what you have paid for up to that point is yours to take elsewhere.
Before any software is discussed: how an order becomes an invoice, where the same figure is entered twice, what has to be true for month-end to close, and which spreadsheets are load-bearing.
A written requirements document you could put to any supplier — including ones that are not us. Only then the question of whether the current system can be made to work, and only after that the question of replacing it.
Configuration against the agreed process, then the data. We run a period in parallel and reconcile it against the existing system, so the numbers are proven before the business depends on them.
Cutover, then support through the first month-end — the point at which every gap that survived testing makes itself known. Handover happens after that close, not before it.
What you get
Advisory work is easy to buy and hard to hold on to. These are the artefacts that remain with you afterwards, and they belong to you whether or not the engagement continues.
Where this is not the answer
We will tell you when you do not need a new ERP. A good share of what presents as a system problem is a process problem wearing a system’s clothes, and replacing the software carries it across intact — at considerable cost, and with the added disadvantage that everyone now blames the new system.
Tell us what you are trying to improve and we will tell you, plainly, whether we are the right people for it.
Also in services
For boards, chief executives and finance directors carrying technology decisions they have no independent way to interrogate.
Learn moreFor organisations under pressure to have an AI position, who would rather have one working process than five pilots.
Learn moreFor operations, finance and service leaders who can see that work takes longer than it should but cannot point to where it goes.
Learn moreFor management teams whose meetings spend more time reconciling figures than deciding what to do about them.
Learn moreFor businesses whose systems are now too important to be looked after by whoever happens to be good with computers.
Learn more